Entertainment

Diddy Ordered to Forfeit ‘Freak Off’ Evidence, Including Notorious ‘Ibiza Tapes’

Diddy Ordered to Forfeit ‘Freak Off’ Evidence, Including Notorious ‘Ibiza Tapes’

NEW YORK — In a major post-sentencing development, embattled music mogul Sean “Diddy” Combs has been ordered by a federal court to forfeit all materials tied to his so-called “freak offs” — including the now-infamous “Ibiza Tapes” — as part of his punishment for violating the Mann Act.

The decision, filed Wednesday and obtained by Complex, marks one of the final moves in the federal government’s sweeping case against the once-celebrated hip-hop icon. The forfeiture agreement requires Diddy to surrender a cache of tapes, hard drives, phones, and other electronic devices that prosecutors say were used to document or facilitate his criminal conduct.

The ‘Freak Off’ Evidence: What Authorities Found

According to court filings, the forfeiture order encompasses materials seized during federal raids of Diddy’s Miami and Los Angeles homes in March 2024, as well as items discovered at a Manhattan hotel near the time of his September 2024 arrest.

Among the evidence, investigators uncovered video cassette tapes, hard drives, USB drives, iPhones, iPads, computers, and $9,000 in cash. The seized property, the government said, was “used or intended to be used” in connection with Diddy’s illicit activities, many of which were described in disturbing detail during his recent trial.

Of particular interest are the “Ibiza Tapes”, reportedly labeled video cassettes retrieved from his Miami estate. Though the contents have not been publicly described, their mere existence has fueled intense speculation online and in entertainment circles.

Federal authorities have turned custody of the evidence over to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which will maintain “secure custody and control” of all items indefinitely.

The Mysterious ‘Ibiza Tapes’

The so-called “Ibiza Tapes” have become a focal point of intrigue in the aftermath of Diddy’s conviction. While the government has not confirmed their contents, court testimony from multiple witnesses — including Cassie Ventura, Diddy’s ex-girlfriend and longtime alleged victim — has added chilling context.

Ventura told the court that Diddy often recorded his private “freak offs,” a term prosecutors said he used to describe drug-fueled, coercive sex gatherings involving multiple participants. She also alleged that he threatened to release compromising recordings of her as a means of control.

Cassie and others testified that these events took place in various locations, including luxury properties in Miami, Los Angeles, and overseas — notably on the island of Ibiza, a popular party destination known for its elite nightlife and celebrity getaways.

Though unverified, the speculation that the “Ibiza Tapes” could contain footage related to these encounters has sparked renewed public outcry. Victims’ advocates are now urging authorities to protect the privacy of individuals who may appear in the recordings while ensuring they are not destroyed or mishandled.

From Global Icon to Federal Inmate

Once a towering figure in entertainment, Sean “Diddy” Combs built an empire spanning music, fashion, spirits, and media. His label, Bad Boy Records, launched the careers of The Notorious B.I.G., Faith Evans, and Mase, cementing his influence in hip-hop history.

That legacy began to unravel in 2023 when multiple women — including Cassie Ventura — filed civil lawsuits accusing Diddy of sexual assault, abuse, and coercion. The allegations prompted federal investigations that culminated in Diddy’s arrest in September 2024 and subsequent conviction for transportation to engage in prostitution, a violation of the Mann Act.

In early October 2025, Judge Arun Subramanian sentenced Diddy to 50 months (4 years and 2 months) in federal prison after a high-profile trial that exposed a disturbing pattern of misconduct. Although he was acquitted of sex trafficking and racketeering charges, the conviction still marked a dramatic fall from grace.

Diddy’s Plea for a Favorable Prison Placement Denied

Following his sentencing, Diddy and his attorneys requested that Judge Subramanian recommend incarceration at FCI Fort Dix, a low-security federal facility in New Jersey known for housing white-collar offenders.

The judge, however, denied the request, stating that he would instead advise the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) to locate Diddy “as close as possible to the New York metropolitan area” — effectively leaving his final placement to federal discretion.

Legal analysts have interpreted the judge’s decision as a signal that Diddy will not receive any special treatment. “This is a message that celebrity status won’t dictate leniency behind bars,” said criminal justice expert Dr. Raymond Ellis. “The forfeiture order and prison assignment denial reinforce that point.”

A Legacy Tainted by Exploitation

For decades, Diddy embodied the image of success — a mogul who transformed hustle into an empire. But as his criminal case unfolded, that image shattered, replaced by accounts of abuse, manipulation, and predatory behavior spanning years.

Prosecutors portrayed Diddy as a man consumed by control, using money, drugs, and fear to dominate others. His “freak offs,” once whispered about in Hollywood gossip circles, were presented in court as evidence of systemic exploitation.

The forfeiture of his personal archives — including the “Ibiza Tapes” — is now being viewed as both symbolic and practical justice. For victims, it represents a step toward closure. For the government, it eliminates any chance that the material could be sold, leaked, or weaponized in the future.

The Next Chapter

While Diddy begins serving his sentence, attention has shifted to the broader implications of his downfall. Industry insiders believe his conviction and forfeiture could prompt a wider investigation into the entertainment world’s culture of excess and abuse, echoing the ripple effects of the #MeToo movement.

As for Genie Exum and others who have come forward with personal stories involving the disgraced mogul, their voices continue to build pressure for transparency — not only about what Diddy did, but about how the industry enabled him for so long.

Continue Reading