Homestead Woman Accused of Killing Partner Takes the Stand in Her Own Defense

MIAMI — The murder trial of Daisy Link, a 30-year-old Homestead woman accused of fatally shooting her on-again, off-again partner, entered a dramatic phase on Wednesday as she took the witness stand to testify in her own defense.

The case, which stems from a June 2022 shooting that left Pedro Jimenez dead, has drawn widespread attention in South Florida — not only because of the killing but also due to Link’s life behind bars and the shocking revelation that she became pregnant while incarcerated last year.

A Relationship Marked by Turmoil

According to court testimony and police records, Link and Jimenez shared a tumultuous romantic relationship that spanned several years. The couple had two children together, and friends described their relationship as deeply emotional but often volatile.

Defense attorneys painted a picture of a woman trapped in a cycle of domestic conflict, arguing that Link’s actions on the day of the shooting were motivated by fear, not malice.

During testimony, Link recounted years of tension and alleged abuse, saying that arguments with Jimenez frequently escalated into physical altercations. Her defense team claims that her mental state at the time of the incident was one of panic and self-preservation, rather than intent to kill.

The Day of the Shooting

The fatal encounter occurred in June 2022 outside the couple’s shared residence in Homestead. Prosecutors say an argument between Link and Jimenez turned violent, and in the heat of the moment, Link grabbed a firearm and fired a shot that struck Jimenez as he was trying to flee.

Witnesses called to the stand earlier in the week testified that they heard shouting followed by a single gunshot. Police reports indicate that Jimenez was found nearby with a gunshot wound and later pronounced dead at the scene.

Link was arrested shortly after the shooting and charged with second-degree murder, a felony that carries a potential life sentence if convicted.

The Defense: A Plea of Fear and Survival

Taking the stand in her own defense, Link maintained that she did not intend to kill Jimenez. Speaking through tears, she told jurors that she fired the gun because she feared for her life.

Her attorneys argued that Link’s actions were the culmination of years of intimidation and trauma. “She believed she had no other choice,” one defense lawyer said.

They allege that Jimenez had been physically aggressive and that on the night of the shooting, she genuinely believed he was going to harm her.

Defense experts testified about battered woman syndrome, suggesting that Link’s perception of danger may have been heightened due to prolonged emotional and physical abuse.

The Prosecution: An Act of Anger, Not Self-Defense

Prosecutors presented a starkly different version of events. They allege that Link acted out of rage, not fear, shooting Jimenez as he turned to run away during their argument.

Assistant State Attorneys highlighted evidence suggesting the bullet trajectory was consistent with the victim moving away from Link when he was shot — undermining her claim of imminent threat.

Prosecutors also questioned her credibility, pointing to inconsistencies between her initial police statements and later courtroom testimony.

“The defendant made a choice,” a prosecutor said in closing arguments. “She chose to pick up a gun and end a man’s life — not in self-defense, but in anger.”

A Life Behind Bars and Public Scrutiny

The trial has attracted significant media attention due to an unusual twist in Link’s story: while awaiting trial in jail, she became pregnant — a fact that raised questions about jail protocols and staff conduct.

Corrections officials confirmed the pregnancy last year but did not disclose details on how it occurred. The Miami-Dade State Attorney’s Office launched a separate investigation into possible misconduct at the detention facility, though no public findings have been released.

The revelation made headlines, casting Link into the public spotlight and complicating public perception of her case. Some view her as a woman failed by the system and trapped in a cycle of abuse, while others see her as manipulative and dangerous.

Emotional Testimony

On the stand, Link spoke about her children, her past relationship, and her regrets. “I wish I had walked away,” she said softly, at one point wiping away tears. “I didn’t want this to happen. I was scared. I just wanted to protect myself.”

Her testimony appeared to resonate with some courtroom observers, though prosecutors sought to portray her emotional display as a strategic attempt to sway the jury.

The Legal Battle Ahead

As the trial moves toward closing arguments, the outcome remains uncertain. The jury must decide whether Link’s actions were an act of self-defense or a deliberate crime of passion.

Under Florida law, second-degree murder is defined as an unlawful killing “perpetrated by an act imminently dangerous to another and evincing a depraved mind regardless of human life.” To secure a conviction, prosecutors must prove intent — though not premeditation.

If the jury finds that Link acted out of fear or in self-defense, the charges could be reduced to manslaughter, or she could be acquitted entirely.

Broader Implications: Domestic Violence and the Law

The case highlights the complexities of domestic violence-related homicide cases, where emotional history and fear often blur the lines between aggression and self-defense.

Advocates for domestic violence survivors argue that women in abusive relationships may feel trapped and respond impulsively during moments of confrontation. Still, prosecutors and victims’ rights groups stress that the justice system must balance empathy with accountability.

Dr. Angela Ruiz, a Miami-based legal psychologist, said such cases often hinge on the jury’s interpretation of “reasonable fear.”

“When abuse is alleged, jurors have to assess not just the act itself but the emotional reality behind it,” Ruiz said. “It becomes less about what happened in a single moment and more about what built up to that moment.”

What Comes Next

Judge and jury proceedings are expected to continue through the week. Closing arguments could begin as soon as Friday, with a verdict potentially following shortly thereafter.

For now, Link remains held without bond as she awaits the jury’s decision — a decision that will determine whether she walks free or spends decades behind bars.

‍