Met Police says it will no longer investigate non-crime hate incidents

In a significant shift of policy, the Metropolitan Police Service (Met) announced that it will no longer investigate non-crime hate incidents (NCHIs) — incidents perceived as motivated by hostility or prejudice but which do not meet the threshold for criminal prosecution. The move follows heavy public and political scrutiny after the arrest and subsequent decision not to prosecute comedian Graham Linehan over social-media posts, which sparked a wider debate about free speech, policing and the limits of law enforcement. expressandstar.com+3Sky News+3Vanguard News+3

NCHIs, introduced partly in the wake of the 1993 murder of Stephen Lawrence, are incidents where someone alleges that an act was motivated by hostility towards a protected characteristic (such as race, gender identity, religion or sexual orientation) but where no criminal offence has been identified. The Met’s new decision aims to give clearer direction to officers, reduce ambiguity and allow resources to focus on genuine criminal investigations. The New York Sun+1

Why the Change?

The announcement highlights a growing concern across policing circles that the current framework placed officers in an “impossible position” when dealing with contentious social-media posts and cultural disputes rather than clear acts of criminality. As the Met’s statement put it:

“The Commissioner has been clear he doesn’t believe officers should be policing toxic culture war debates… As a result, the Met will no longer investigate non-crime hate incidents.” The Standard+1

Following the decision by the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) that there was no realistic prospect of conviction in one high-profile case, the Met confirmed it would continue recording NCHIs for intelligence purposes but would not open full investigations into them. expressandstar.com+1

What It Means in Practice

• Investigations of NCHIs will cease: Officers will no longer conduct investigations into incidents where no criminal offence is identified but bias is alleged.
• Recording continues as intelligence: While not investigated, NCHIs will still be logged in the Met’s systems so patterns of behaviour can be tracked. Azat TV+1
• Hate crimes still pursued: Criminal cases that meet the threshold of incitement, violence or other hate-motivated offences will remain a priority. The New York Sun
• Focus on clarity and resource allocation: The move is positioned as freeing up police time and effort for more serious crimes and reducing confusion on what justifies action. GB News+1

Reactions and Implications

The decision has been described by some free-speech campaigners as a “victory for common sense” — particularly in the context of policing online commentary and cultural disputes. Critics of the status quo argued that NCHIs blurred the line between lawful dissent and criminal behaviour, and that recording them could have implications for individuals’ employment records. The Guardian+1

On the other hand, some victim-advocacy groups have expressed concern that removing investigative capacity could reduce the police’s ability to intervene early in situations where hostility may not yet have escalated into crime but could do so. The recording of NCHIs had been justified as a way to monitor community tensions and prevent escalation.

Context and Background

The concept of NCHIs emerged in the early 2000s, largely in response to the Stephen Lawrence Inquiry’s recommendation that police forces monitor incidents of hostility even when they do not meet the criminal threshold. Over time, however, those logs grew substantially — in some years tens of thousands of incidents were recorded. Critics argue that the sheer volume and subjective nature of many of these incidents diverted resources from serious crime. The Times

In recent years, the issue came to a head after high-profile cases of arrests for social-media posts raised questions about policing standards and free-speech rights. The Met’s policy reversal is a landmark in that ongoing debate.

Looking Ahead

For the Met and for policing more broadly in the UK, the key questions will include:

• Whether this policy change will reduce public confidence in how hate-motivated behaviour is handled.
• How data from recorded but non-investigated incidents will be used to identify patterns and inform policing strategy.
• Whether other forces in the UK will follow suit, given similar concerns raised nationally about the impact of recording NCHIs.
• How the legal and legislative framework around hate incidents might be revised, including potential amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill. The Times

‍