At first glance, Tilly Norwood looks like just another actress trying to make her way in Hollywood — polished, photogenic, and ready for the spotlight. But Tilly isn’t a person at all. She’s a generative AI creation, a synthetic “actress” designed by the London-based company Particle6 and its subsidiary studio, Xicoia. Her debut has become a lightning rod for discussions about the future of entertainment — and for good reason.
At last week’s Zurich Film Festival, Eline Van der Velden, founder and CEO of both Particle6 and Xicoia, revealed that talent agents have already expressed interest in representing Tilly Norwood. While she didn’t specify which agencies were considering it, that single statement was enough to spark a wave of media coverage and industry chatter. The idea of an AI actress signing with a human talent agency is both provocative and unsettling, raising deeper questions about what “talent” and “performance” even mean in the age of artificial intelligence.
Van der Velden has said that she envisions Tilly becoming “the next Scarlett Johansson or Natalie Portman.” But that comparison falls apart under scrutiny. Tilly Norwood isn’t a performer — she’s a high-resolution puppet, animated and voiced through algorithms trained on the likeness, gestures, and speech of real humans. She cannot think, feel, or improvise. Everything she does is directed, coded, or prompted by a human operator. Calling her an actress is like calling Siri a singer because she can recite lyrics.
Xicoia’s description of how Tilly “interacts” with people online makes the illusion even more disconcerting. According to Deadline, the studio is developing systems that would allow Tilly to “engage in unscripted conversations, perform monologues, respond to trends in real time, and adapt tone and references to suit platform-specific audiences.” In other words, she’s a chatbot with a face — a machine built to mimic humanity so convincingly that audiences forget she’s fake.
Yet even the company admits she can’t operate independently. Behind every supposed “unscripted” moment is a team of programmers, writers, and producers controlling her output. Van der Velden herself has acknowledged that “human creative oversight” is still necessary for the AI to function. That oversight isn’t a minor technical note — it’s the defining feature of what Tilly really is: a performance tool masquerading as a performer.
If this all sounds like a marketing stunt, that’s because it is. Tilly Norwood’s rollout has followed a familiar pattern in the AI industry — blending hype, controversy, and provocation to force the public to engage with something they might otherwise ignore. It’s a classic psyop in the marketing sense: generate enough buzz that people start accepting an artificial construct as legitimate through sheer exposure.
The tactic is reminiscent of what tech companies have done across other sectors — positioning AI as both inevitable and revolutionary, even when its real capabilities fall short of the hype. By pushing the idea that AI actors are the next frontier, studios like Xicoia hope to normalize a future where synthetic personalities compete with real artists for work, attention, and cultural relevance.
That normalization is already underway. Italian producer Andrea Iervolino recently announced plans for an AI director modeled after “the poetic and dreamlike language of great European cinema.” To many, this sounds absurd — a kind of parody of artistic ambition. But these announcements are part of a deliberate cultural desensitization process. Each time the public hears about an “AI actress” or “AI filmmaker,” the concept becomes a little less shocking.
Van der Velden, who is herself an actor and comedian, surely knows that genuine acting involves much more than hitting marks or reciting lines. It’s about emotional truth — the unpredictable alchemy that happens between performer and audience. By pretending that a computer-generated image can replace that, Xicoia isn’t innovating — it’s imitating artistry while hollowing it out.
Even more troubling is the subtext in Xicoia’s own promotional content. In the company’s “AI Commissioner” parody video, a male avatar tells Tilly he loves her because “she’ll do anything I say.” It’s a chilling line — and not just because it sounds misogynistic. It exposes the underlying fantasy at play: total control. Unlike human performers, Tilly can’t refuse direction, demand fair pay, or push back creatively. She’s infinitely compliant — and that compliance is being marketed as a feature.
This is precisely why SAG-AFTRA, the actors’ union, condemned Tilly Norwood’s creation. In a statement, the union said that “Tilly Norwood doesn’t solve any problem — it creates the problem of using stolen performances to put actors out of work, jeopardizing livelihoods and devaluing human artistry.” That sentiment captures the core issue. AI “actors” are trained on the labor, expressions, and voices of real people — often without their consent — and are now being positioned as replacements.
The irony, of course, is that none of this is new. Hollywood has flirted with virtual performers before. In 2001, Final Fantasy: The Spirits Within introduced “Aki Ross,” a computer-generated character that studio Squaresoft tried to market as a “digital actress.” Despite the hype, audiences didn’t buy it. The illusion of humanity simply wasn’t there — and still isn’t. What’s changed today isn’t the technology, but the narrative surrounding it.
By dressing up Tilly Norwood as a “breakthrough,” Xicoia is trying to brute-force itself into relevance — exploiting the same mix of fascination and fear that has fueled every major AI controversy so far. The real goal isn’t to make Tilly a movie star. It’s to make the public comfortable enough with the concept that AI-generated content becomes indistinguishable from human-made art.
Whether or not Tilly Norwood ever “acts” in a major film is beside the point. The psyop has already worked. Her name is being discussed across major entertainment outlets, and audiences are debating whether an algorithm deserves an agent. That conversation alone helps legitimize the idea — and that’s exactly what Xicoia wants.
.png)
.png)
