How Trump's Brazen Bailout Bet Paid Off—for Milei and American Leverage in the Southern Hemisphere

October 27, 2025

As Donald Trump once quipped in *The Art of the Deal*, "The dollar always talks in the end." In the volatile arena of Argentine politics, those words rang truer than ever this weekend, where a timely infusion of American cash—and the pointed threat of its withdrawal—appears to have tipped the scales for President Javier Milei's embattled libertarian movement.

Milei's La Libertad Avanza party stunned pollsters and pundits alike by securing nearly 41 percent of the vote in Sunday's midterm elections, a resounding rebuke to expectations of a drubbing. The result, which outpaced the Peronist opposition's 32 percent haul, sent Argentine bonds, stocks, and the beleaguered peso soaring on Monday morning. For Milei, the shaggy-haired economist-turned-president, it was a much-needed validation of his two-year "shock therapy" experiment, amid a cascade of corruption scandals and an economy still limping from hyperinflation's aftershocks.

But the real architect of this turnaround? None other than Trump himself, whose $40 billion lifeline—split between a $20 billion currency swap and another $20 billion in direct aid—arrived just as Milei's prospects looked dire. The U.S. president had been blunt during Milei's recent White House visit: Win big, or watch the generosity dry up. "If he doesn’t win, we’re gone," Trump had warned, framing the bailout not as charity but as a high-stakes wager on his South American protégé.

Critics in Buenos Aires were quick to decry the intervention as electoral arm-twisting, evoking memories of Washington's clumsy meddling in Brazil's politics earlier this year, which only fueled anti-U.S. sentiment there. Pundits speculated on a backlash, with voters recoiling at the spectacle of a foreign leader dictating their ballot choices. Yet, as results rolled in, any such revolt failed to materialize. If anything, Trump's gambit seemed to crystallize the desperation gripping Argentina's body politic: In a nation scarred by decades of Peronist mismanagement, the allure of Yankee dollars proved irresistible.

Diego Guelar, a seasoned Argentine diplomat who has served as ambassador to both Beijing and Washington, captured the unease in a post-election interview. "It's awful, this direct intervention—Trump essentially telling voters, 'Back my friend or get left behind,'" Guelar said. But he conceded the tactic's crude effectiveness: "People here get it. They see the economic mess as the opposition's fault and grasp that American help is the lifeline we can't afford to lose."

Brian Winter, editor of *Americas Quarterly* and a keen observer of the region's twists, called it "a masterstroke in the Trump playbook." Speaking from New York, Winter noted the precision of the timing: Milei had been reeling from a provincial election flop in September and mounting market tremors. Trump's rescue package, announced in the bailout's wake, arrived like manna, steadying nerves just days before the vote. "Voters are still pinning the blame on the Peronists for years of chaos," Winter observed. "But optics matter in politics, and Trump gets the win. It screams: Stick with the U.S. ally, and the rewards flow."

The victory underscores a broader shift in Trump's Latin America strategy—one that's equal parts carrot and stick, harking back to an era of gunboat diplomacy dusted off for the 21st century. Beyond Argentina, the White House has ramped up pressure tactics: a naval presence off Venezuela's shores, blistering accusations of cartel complicity against Mexico's government, threats to reclaim the Panama Canal by force, and 50 percent tariffs on Brazilian exports. These moves haven't exactly endeared Trump to the hemisphere's capitals, where resentment simmers over what many see as imperial overreach.

Yet, as Winter points out, results are trickling in. Mexico has stepped up border security and migration enforcement under the shadow of those threats. Panama has edged Chinese interests away from canal-adjacent projects. And in Brazil, after an initial tariff standoff, talks are underway for a landmark deal on rare earths and critical minerals—proof that Trump's bluster, for all its risks, can bend adversaries toward the table.

Of course, this 19th-century revival could sour quickly. Overreliance on financial threats might breed lasting enmity, especially if economic headwinds return or Milei's reforms falter. For now, though, the formula works: Friends get fortified; foes get the squeeze. And for Milei, ever the showman, the gratitude was effusive. In a victory tweet, he hailed Trump as "a great friend of the Argentine Republic," capping it with their shared battle cry: "MAGA."

As Argentina awakens to this new chapter, one thing is clear: In the art of the deal—global edition—the dollar doesn't just talk. It votes.

‍