Former White House strategist Steve Bannon has reignited controversy over presidential term limits, claiming in a recent interview that “there is a plan” for Donald Trump to serve a third term as president in 2028. His remarks, made during an interview with The Economist, have raised eyebrows across the political spectrum and renewed debate about the boundaries of executive power in the United States.
“There Is a Plan”
Speaking in his characteristically confident style, Bannon declared that Trump’s political movement is far from finished — and that the former president could return to office even after serving two full terms. “He’s going to get a third term,” Bannon said. “Trump is going to be president in ‘28, and people ought to just get accommodated with that.”
When pressed about the legal impossibility of such a scenario under the U.S. Constitution’s 22nd Amendment — which bars any individual from being elected president more than twice — Bannon remained unfazed. “There’s many different alternatives,” he said. “At the appropriate time we’ll lay out what the plan is, but there is a plan, and Trump will be the president in ‘28.”
While Bannon provided no concrete explanation or mechanism for how such a move could occur, his comments have fueled speculation that some within Trump’s orbit are exploring ways to challenge or reinterpret the constitutional limit.
Constitutional and Historical Context
The 22nd Amendment, ratified in 1951, was specifically designed to prevent any U.S. president from serving more than two elected terms. The rule was introduced after Franklin D. Roosevelt broke precedent by winning four consecutive terms during the Great Depression and World War II. His presidency sparked fears of excessive executive power and the potential for a de facto presidency-for-life.
Since then, the amendment has stood as one of the bedrock safeguards of American democracy, ensuring peaceful transitions of power and preventing the kind of prolonged personal rule seen in other countries.
For a president to legally serve beyond two terms, the U.S. Congress would need to pass — and three-fourths of the states would need to ratify — a new constitutional amendment repealing or revising the 22nd. The process is intentionally difficult and requires broad bipartisan consensus. In the modern political climate, such a change appears virtually impossible.
Despite that, Bannon’s remarks reflect a growing narrative among Trump loyalists who see the former president not just as a politician, but as the leader of a long-term populist movement that transcends conventional political rules.
Bannon’s Defiance — and a Familiar Playbook
Bannon, who served as Trump’s chief strategist during the early months of his first administration, has long positioned himself as one of the intellectual architects of “Trumpism.” His political philosophy centers on nationalist populism, distrust of institutions, and a combative approach toward the media and political establishment.
In the interview, Bannon dismissed concerns about legal or institutional constraints, suggesting that Trump’s movement has faced greater challenges before. “We had longer odds in 2016 and longer odds in 2024 than we’ve got in 2028,” he said. “We have to finish what we started.”
The message — equal parts defiant and prophetic — signals that Bannon and other right-wing strategists see 2028 not as the end of the Trump era, but as the next battle in a larger ideological war.
Trump’s Own Provocations
Bannon’s comments came just days after Donald Trump himself appeared to tease the idea of running for president “forever.” In a video posted to Truth Social, the former president shared a mock magazine cover bearing the headline “How Trumpism Outlasts Trump.” The video zooms in on a series of fictional campaign signs reading “Trump 2028,” “Trump 2032,” and “Trump 2036,” all set to the ominous tones of Edvard Grieg’s In the Hall of the Mountain King.
The tongue-in-cheek clip was interpreted by supporters as political trolling — a way to bait critics who fear Trump’s growing influence. But for others, it reinforced concerns about his disregard for democratic norms and the constitutional checks on executive power.
Political Reactions and Democratic Concerns
Democrats and many legal scholars reacted sharply to Bannon’s remarks, viewing them as yet another example of Trump allies testing the boundaries of American democracy. Critics argue that even floating the idea of a third term undermines respect for the Constitution and normalizes authoritarian rhetoric.
Trump’s critics have long accused him of harboring authoritarian tendencies, citing his refusal to concede the 2020 election, his repeated attacks on the judiciary and the media, and his efforts to expand executive authority. The notion of a “Trump 2028” presidency, they argue, fits neatly into that pattern.
Those concerns have also been reflected in a wave of public protests. Last weekend, organizers estimated that nearly seven million Americans participated in demonstrations across the country under the banner “No Kings.” The marches, held in cities from New York to Los Angeles, were intended as a stand against what participants described as Trump’s growing “authoritarianism” and the erosion of institutional checks and balances.
A Populist Movement Without Limits?
Despite the outrage, Bannon’s prediction may not be meant literally. Political observers note that his rhetoric often serves to rally the base, keeping Trump’s supporters engaged and energized even after elections are over. By framing Trumpism as a long-term movement rather than a series of campaigns, Bannon seeks to extend its influence deep into the Republican Party’s future.
Still, the fact that such talk is being taken seriously reflects how profoundly Trump has reshaped American political discourse. A generation ago, suggesting a third presidential term would have been political suicide. Today, it’s treated as another provocative headline — part of the spectacle that defines Trump-era politics.
Constitutional experts remain confident that any actual attempt to defy the 22nd Amendment would face immediate and insurmountable legal challenges. “It’s not possible under current law,” one scholar said. “No amount of political planning can change that without an amendment, and that process takes years, not months.”
Nevertheless, Bannon’s confidence — and Trump’s willingness to stoke the idea — underscore the enduring tension between populist power and constitutional restraint in the United States.
Looking Ahead
Whether or not there is any “plan” in motion, the political significance of Bannon’s remarks is clear: Trumpism remains the dominant force within the Republican Party, and its architects have no intention of relinquishing that control. By invoking the possibility of a 2028 presidency, Bannon has once again pushed the limits of political imagination — and forced America to confront how much it still takes the rule of law for granted.
%20(2).png)
